On the off chance that you at any point had any uncertainty that democrats consider your cash theirs, Nancy Pelosi recently eradicated that. As indicated by her, on the off chance that you are “permitted” to keep the cash you acquire, that is truly taking from needy individuals who didn’t win it. I know this is some bewildering liberal rationale, however that is the manner by which they like things. They would like to make things so confounding that you can’t tell how horse crap everything is.
The House Republicans are at the end of the day striving for an ObamaCare rescind and supplant. This most up to date form would put $130 billion in a high hazard pool more than 10 years to cover needy individuals with existing conditions. Notwithstanding that, another $8 billion more than 5 years was attached on to assist individuals who can’t manage the cost of medical coverage.
Since Nancy Pelosi can’t math and despises everything that isn’t from her own gathering, she flipped her cover.
What you would need is most likely about $200 billion more than 10 years. What they’ve done is $8 billion more than five years. In the event that you separate that by the quantity of individuals who have a prior therapeutic condition, you get about [$200 or $300] a year,” said Pelosi.
For one thing, not everybody with a prior condition can’t manage the cost of medical coverage, and furthermore the GOP is putting forth up $146 billion more than 10 years, which isn’t that distant from the arbitrarily expressed $200 billion Pelosi cases is required.
Notwithstanding that, she predicts passing and annihilation:
“It’s a joke. It’s an extremely dismal, fatal joke,” she said.
Presently here’s the place the House Minority Leader says it is a wrongdoing for you to keep your own particular cash. She says the Republicans need to race through an ObamaCare nullify on the grounds that they require the cash to offer a tax cut.
“They’re in a rush since they require this cash to offer an expense reprieve to the wealthiest individuals in our nation. This bill will have the greatest move of riches ever — Robin Hood backward. That is the objective of their duty charge, yet they require this cash from your medicinal services keeping in mind the end goal to do that,” Pelosi said.
Remain with me on this one Nancy: ObamaCare raised expenses and made most working individuals spend more cash on shittier scope. Revoking this silly law implies that working individuals will have the capacity to keep a greater amount of their cash. Additionally, offering a tax cut implies that working individuals will have the capacity to keep much a greater amount of that cash that they gain.
Needy individuals are not qualified for the products of other individuals’ work. Giving individuals a chance to keep a greater amount of the cash they gain is not taking from destitute individuals since that cash was never theirs in any case. Perceive how that functions?
Taking and redistribution of riches would be if the administration passed a law that constrained individuals to by an item from a privately owned business at expanded costs so that same item could then be given for nothing to sluggish individuals who have settled on shitty life decisions. You know, sort of like ObamaCare.
I comprehend Pelosi’s perplexity here, she is after each of the a democrat. In their distorted state of mind, each dollar you win has a place with them so they can make it rain on the poor at all effective and profitable way that could be available.